Victorian Resources Online (archived)
Archived content — This page contains material from the Victorian Resources Online (VRO) website. It is no longer maintained and is provided for reference only. This content is hosted by CeRDI and is not endorsed by Agriculture Victoria.

Sitemap

TOPCROP2

Location: Arkona

Australian Soil Classification: Hypercalcic, Mesonatric, Red SODOSOL

General Landscape Description: Rise on a gently undulating plain.
Site Description: Cropping Paddock (lentils 2002, barley 2001).
Geology: Quaternary deposits (Woorinen Formation).

Image: TOPCROP2 landscape

TOPCROP1 Landscape

Soil Profile Morphology:

Surface Soil

Ap0-14 cmDark brown (10YR3/3); soft surface condition; sandy loam; weakly structured; firm consistence dry, stronger consistence at base of horizon; pH 8.1; sharp change to:Image: TOPCROP2 profile
TOPCROP2 Profile
Subsoil
B2114-35 cm Yellowish red (5YR5/6) and light yellowish brown (10YR6/4); heavy clay; moderate to strong coarse blocky structure; strong consistence dry; pH 8.7; clear change to:
B22k35-80 cmReddish yellow (5YR6/6); light medium clay; moderate coarse blocky, parting to moderate coarse to medium polyhedral structure; many (40%) soft calcareous segregations; pH 9.4:
B2380-120 cm Yellowish red (5YR5/8) and light yellowish brown (10YR6/4); medium clay; strong very coarse prismatic, parting to moderate coarse blocky structure; strong consistence dry; manganese flecks; pH 8.0.

Key Profile Features:

Soil Profile Characteristics:

pH
Salinity Rating
Surface
(A1 horizon)
Moderately Alkaline
Medium
Sodic
None1
Subsoil
(B21 horizon)
Strongly Alkaline
Medium-High
Strongly Sodic
Complete
Deeper Subsoil
(at 90+ cm)
Moderately Alkaline
Extremely High
Strongly Sodic
Slight
1 Slight dispersion after remoulding.

Image: TOPCROP2 graphs
The surface is moderately alkaline. The subsoil is strongly alkaline becoming moderately alkaline with depth.The upper subsoil has a medium to high salinity rating becoming very high with depth.The surface is sodic. The upper subsoil is strongly sodic becoming very strongly sodic with depth.Boron increases with depth.Clay content increases markedly at the surface/ subsoil horizon boundary.

Chemical and Physical Analysis:

Horizon
Horizon
Depth
(cm)
pH
(water)
pH
(CaCl2)
EC
dS/m
NaCl
%



Organic Carbon
%
Nitrogen
%
Boron
mg/kg
Exchangeable Cations
Field Capacity
pF2.5
Wilting
Point
pF4.2
Coarse
Sand
(0.2-2.0mm)
Fine
Sand
(0.02-0.2mm)
Silt
(0.002-0.02mm)
Clay
(<0.002mm)
Ca
Mg
K
Na
Meq/100g
Ap
0-14
8.1
7.6
0.23
0.86
0.07
1.6
7.0
3.1
0.44
1.2
12.3
6.2
45.7
35.4
4.0
13.0
B21
14-35
8.7
7.9
0.51
0.07
5.2
6.6
8.5
0.6
3.9
30.7
15.6
37.8
22.4
3.0
34.0
B22k
35-80
9.4
8.7
1.6
0.28
11
3.2
12
1.0
7.9
35.9
20.1
23.5
16.6
3.0
37.5
B23
80-100
8.0
7.6
2.0
0.35
1.9
12
1.0
8.9
35.6
19.9


Management Considerations:

Surface (A) Horizons
Subsoil (B) Horizons

Profile Described By: Mark Imhof and Brooke Thompson (December 2002)

References:

Cartwright, B., Zarcinas, B.A, and Mayfield, A.H. (1984). Toxic concentrations of boron in a red-brown earth at Gladstone, South Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 22. 261-72.

Hobson, K. (2001). Boron Tolerant Lentils. In On The Pulse pamphlet. NRE. 2001.

Quinlan, J. (2001). Sorting out the Boron Problem. Wimmera Farming & Landcare Newsletter. 19-20.

Rengasamy, P. and Churchman, G.J. (1999). Cation Exchange Capacity, Exchangeable Cations and Sodicity. In: Soil Analysis – An Interpretation Manual. (eds. Peverill, K.I et al). CSIRO Publishing.